Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 91761 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2009 22:30:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Oct 2009 22:30:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 20396 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2009 22:30:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 20324 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2009 22:30:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 20316 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2009 22:30:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 22:30:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 22:30:44 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA1B7234C04C for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 15:30:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1447123832.1254436223695.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 15:30:23 -0700 (PDT) From: "Uwe Schindler (JIRA)" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1935) Generify PriorityQueue In-Reply-To: <115941357.1254403885652.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761372#action_12761372 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1935: --------------------------------------- Was it to avoid a perforance impact of casting or only for cleaner code? Because the generic version of PQ does noch change anything, the resulting byte code is identical (you can compare that with a decompilation using JAD). The casts are added by the Java Compiler automatically. The lessThan method is covariant overloaded (passed through) by javac: lessThan(Integer, Integer) will appear as such in the class byte code, but javac will add lessThan(Object, Object) that delgates around (which may be a small perf impact), as it is called by the compiled code of PQ (PQ does not know anything about generics in its byte code). > Generify PriorityQueue > ---------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-1935 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1935 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Task > Components: Other > Affects Versions: 2.9 > Reporter: Uwe Schindler > Assignee: Uwe Schindler > Fix For: 3.0 > > Attachments: LUCENE-1935.patch > > > Priority Queue should use generics like all other Java 5 Collection API classes. This very simple, but makes code more readable. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org