lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Uwe Schindler" <...@thetaphi.de>
Subject RE: LUCENE-1954 and 2.9.1
Date Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:15:03 GMT
Yes, this was already fixed in trunk (by adding generics, where the return
value is generified to Fieldable). For 2.9.1 it is too late, I think? Mike?

Mike: Do you have already a release note formulated? The main information
should be the bug fixes, but also that only 2.9.1 will be binary compatible
to 3.0 (when all deprecation warnings in customer's code removed), because
we added new methods, deprecated the old analyzer ctors and also
un-deprecated some methods. So users migrating to 3.0 should first use 2.9.1
not 2.9.0 to clean up their code from deprecations.

Uwe

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bernd Fondermann [mailto:bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 9:05 PM
> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: LUCENE-1954 and 2.9.1
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Probably I'm too late to the party pointing out that LUCENE-1954 is
> especially suited to be applied to the 2.9.x line.
> The patch is obsolete for 3.x/TRUNK.
> 
>   Bernd
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message