lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1
Date Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:15:17 GMT
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Yonik Seeley
<yonik@lucidimagination.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>> Looks good. One thing:
>>
>> In Mark's artifacts, he changed the common-build.xml to not have -dev in the
>> version before the release. You can see this in SVN. I am fine with having
>> -dev in the source artefact, because if someone compiles his own bin from
>> the artefact, it should have -dev in it, because it's not an official build.
>
> Right, having the "-dev" when someone tries to build it themselves is
> the way we should keep it.

+1

So this means in general when doing the release, we leave the -dev in
there?  Ie, leaving the -dev doesn't affect the binary release (which
gets its version, eg in the JAR's manifest, from the -Dversion=2.9.1
on the ant command line), I think?

Mike

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message