lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: contrib and lucene 3.0
Date Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:15:55 GMT
by the way, this russian example is only one I'm familiar with, its hardly
the only new deprecation introduced in 3.0

theres been other new features added to contrib in 3.0, and theres been
other new deprecations added to contrib in 3.0

I saw this when I started trying to clear out the contrib deprecations
earlier today, some of them were just added.

On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Robert Muir <rcmuir@gmail.com> wrote:

> Grant, in this case the new contribution does not require any deprecation,
> it is another implementation for regex and wildcard query that works a bit
> differently than the others.
>
> Not to stray off-topic, but your comment does apply to
> RussianLowerCaseFilter, which is currently marked deprecated in 3.0.
> Until the custom-encoding junk (deprecated in 2.9) was removed, I couldn't
> easily tell that it was simply a duplicate of LowerCaseFilter...
> for now its marked deprecated in 3.0 to be removed in 4.0
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@apache.org>wrote:
>
>> How do you handle deprecations of old stuff for the new contribution
>> (assuming it needs it)?  Seems weird to have a major release that
>> immediately has deprecations.  At the same time, it seems weird to have a
>> major release that doesn't contain new features.  If anything, it is our
>> best opportunity to put in new stuff
>>
>> Traditionally, the only difference between .9 and .0 has been removal of
>> deprecations.  This time around we are saying also JDK 1.5.
>>
>> Not saying we can't do it, just wondering.
>>
>> On Oct 30, 2009, at 3:31 PM, DM Smith wrote:
>>
>>  I don't see any reason to freeze new contributions from any release.
>>
>> On 10/30/2009 03:19 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
>>
>> thanks Michael.
>>
>> does anyone else have any opinion on this issue?
>> fyi we already have several new features committed to 3.0 contrib already
>> (see contrib/CHANGES),
>> but I don't too much care either way, if I should not be adding this
>> feature to 3.0, I'd like to set the version in jira to 3.1
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Michael McCandless <
>> lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I think we should allow new features into contrib for 3.0.
>>>
>>> I don't even like holding new features from core for 3.0.
>>>
>>> In general I don't think it's healthy when trunk is locked down....
>>> Trunk should be like a locomotive that's plowing ahead at all times.
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Robert Muir <rcmuir@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > What is the consensus on new features for contrib for Lucene 3.0? I
>>> know
>>> > that for core, its mostly a java 5 upgrade and deprecation removal.
>>> >
>>> > I want to make sure LUCENE-1606 is set to the right version, but I
>>> figured
>>> > its really not just about that specific issue, I would like to know the
>>> > plans in general.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Robert
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Robert Muir
>>> > rcmuir@gmail.com
>>> >
>>>
>>>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Robert Muir
>> rcmuir@gmail.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Robert Muir
> rcmuir@gmail.com
>



-- 
Robert Muir
rcmuir@gmail.com

Mime
View raw message