lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jake Mannix <jake.man...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: lucene 2.9 sorting algorithm
Date Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:13:08 GMT
Of course, John's running on his mac laptop, which also may be a factor,
which is
another reason why he wanted to see if these carried over onto a linux
desktop (for example).

  -jake

On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Jake Mannix <jake.mannix@gmail.com> wrote:

> It's hard to read the column format, but if you look up above in the thread
> from tonight,
> you can see that yes, for PQ sizes less than 100 elements, multiPQ is
> better, and only
> starts to be worse at around 100 for strings, and 50 for ints.
>
>   -jake
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Yonik Seeley <yonik@lucidimagination.com>wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:35 PM, John Wang <john.wang@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >        Please be patient with me. I am seeing a difference and was
>> wondering
>> > if Mike would see the same thing.
>>
>> Some differences are bound to be seen... with your changes (JVM
>> changes, branch optimizations), are you seeing better average
>> performance with multiPQ?
>>
>> -Yonik
>> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message