lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Busch <busch...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r821434 - /lucene/java/trunk/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/Searcher.java
Date Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:51:21 GMT
On 10/4/09 12:42 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Why will 3.0 be work to upgrade? 2.9 was supposed to be the work, 3.0 no
> work ...
>    

With 2.9 you can be lazy and live with deprecation warnings. With 3.0 
you *have* to switch to undeprecated APIs.

  Michael

> In either case, I don't mind a 2.9.1 - but it hadn't been planned yet
> that I saw.
>
> Michael Busch wrote:
>    
>> Should we fix these kind of things in the 2.9 branch too?
>> I'm 99.9% sure we'll have a 2.9.1 release - 3.0 will be a bunch of
>> work for users to upgrade, so we should definitely deliver a bugfix
>> release for 2.9, even if we (hopefully) only find minor bugs.
>>
>>   Michael
>>
>> On 10/4/09 12:14 AM, markrmiller@apache.org wrote:
>>      
>>> Author: markrmiller
>>> Date: Sat Oct  3 22:14:18 2009
>>> New Revision: 821434
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=821434&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> don't point to deprecated method
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>>       lucene/java/trunk/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/Searcher.java
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>> lucene/java/trunk/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/Searcher.java
>>> URL:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/java/trunk/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/Searcher.java?rev=821434&r1=821433&r2=821434&view=diff
>>>
>>> ==============================================================================
>>>
>>> --- lucene/java/trunk/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/Searcher.java
>>> (original)
>>> +++ lucene/java/trunk/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/Searcher.java
>>> Sat Oct  3 22:14:18 2009
>>> @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@
>>>      *
>>>      *<p>Applications should only use this if they need<i>all</i>
  of the
>>>      * matching documents.  The high-level search API ({@link
>>> -  * Searcher#search(Query)}) is usually more efficient, as it skips
>>> +  * Searcher#search(Query, int)}) is usually more efficient, as it
>>> skips
>>>      * non-high-scoring hits.
>>>      *<p>Note: The<code>score</code>   passed to this method
is a raw
>>> score.
>>>      * In other words, the score will not necessarily be a float whose
>>> value is
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>      
>
>    


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message