Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 72532 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2009 14:18:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Sep 2009 14:18:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 58114 invoked by uid 500); 24 Sep 2009 14:18:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 58037 invoked by uid 500); 24 Sep 2009 14:18:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 58029 invoked by uid 99); 24 Sep 2009 14:18:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:18:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.180] (HELO mail-px0-f180.google.com) (209.85.216.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:18:09 +0000 Received: by pxi10 with SMTP id 10so1686697pxi.20 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:17:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.115.24.9 with SMTP id b9mr5033001waj.204.1253801867698; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:17:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <76c1202b0909240614x70b1c39aha3e713c0a509b7@mail.gmail.com> References: <4AB273E6.9030500@gmail.com> <17fdaa079bda7de5b733a84a15c3f171.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> <4AB278F7.4000308@gmail.com> <6ea79134cd0c651dc00ba8a11479dc37.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> <76c1202b0909220108i710bc67am851acffdaf8404b4@mail.gmail.com> <9ac0c6aa0909220236y6887d5e5r75ab8457c7d27e2@mail.gmail.com> <76c1202b0909240614x70b1c39aha3e713c0a509b7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:17:47 -0400 Message-ID: <9ac0c6aa0909240717s22d041c3k3aaaff11d35f5367@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Lucene Spatial From: lucene To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The usage of deprecated methods (at least Filter.bits()) should be fixed now. Mike On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Alex wrote: > Hi, > > I would definitely give it a hole bunch of love if only I understood how to > have it working :) > > I did a few tests based on the test cases provided in the current version > but without any success... > Moreover, as far as I recall,during my tests some method calls were > deprecated in favour of more recent Lucene 2.9 methods. So I don't know if > it needs rewriting or not. > > I would love to write the javadoc for the entire spatial contrib (I have > some time to do it) but I would really need to understand and to have a > working example to base my writings on ... as for now I am pretty lost. > > > Cheers, > > Alex > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org