Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 58239 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2009 23:33:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Sep 2009 23:33:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 1110 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2009 23:33:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 1023 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2009 23:33:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 1015 invoked by uid 99); 7 Sep 2009 23:33:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:33:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:33:18 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D12234C044 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 16:32:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <836581944.1252366377677.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 16:32:57 -0700 (PDT) From: "Mark Miller (JIRA)" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1898) Decide if we should remove lines numbers from latest Changes In-Reply-To: <572437205.1252366017753.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1898: -------------------------------- Attachment: LUCENE-1898.patch > Decide if we should remove lines numbers from latest Changes > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: LUCENE-1898 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1898 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Other > Reporter: Mark Miller > Fix For: 2.9 > > Attachments: LUCENE-1898.patch > > > As Lucene dev has grown, a new issue has arisen - many times, new changes invalidate old changes. A proper changes file should just list the changes from the last version, not document the dev life of the issues. Keeping changes in proper order now requires a lot of renumbering sometimes. The numbers have no real meaning and could be added to more rich versions (such as the html version) automatically if desired. > I think an * makes a good replacement myself. The issues already have ids that are stable, rather than the current, decorational numbers which are subject to change over a dev cycle. > I think we should replace the numbers with an asterix for the 2.9 section and going forward (ie 4. becomes *). > If we don't get consensus very quickly, this issue won't block. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org