lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Uwe Schindler" <...@thetaphi.de>
Subject RE: Numeric Field index compatibility
Date Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:34:52 GMT
The term format did not change since the major revision with Yonik at the
begin of year. Only the API and term generation was changed (NumericField,
NumericTokenStream).

If you use the same precStep it should work.

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shon Vella [mailto:svella@technologist.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 4:27 PM
> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Numeric Field index compatibility
> 
> I have some indexes that were created using a dev version of 2.9 from
> early June, when the Numeric field stuff was moved to lucene core from
> the query contrib package. Now that 2.9 is becoming available, I need to
> migrate to using the stuff in core and was wondering about the index
> level compatibility between the two. In other words, can I use the stuff
> in core against an index that was created using the contrib stuff?
> 
> -Shon
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message