lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From lucene <luc...@mikemccandless.com>
Subject Re: Lucene Spatial
Date Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:51:43 GMT
Make that a 2nd thank you!

Mike

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Mark Miller <markrmiller@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nice! That is *awesome*. Thank you!
>
> gento0nz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Since my contribution in LUCENE-1732 I have been working on re-writing
>> most of the spatial contrib, particularly the Cartesian Tier code.  I
>> have added javadoc, tests and and have removed many of the classes
>> which were either deprecated, unused or unnecessary.  I have also
>> tried to define easier extension points for adding things like JTS
>> support, and different data formats (whether it be geohashes or
>> traditional latitude and longitude).  Much of the work has been done
>> with Solr integration in mind with the overall goal being to create
>> enterprise ready spatial search support.
>>
>> I am also planning on collaborating with some of the developers from
>> the JPL to improve the range the geographic functions supported and to
>> provide efficient searching with even the most massive and varied of
>> data sets.
>>
>> I have every intention to contribute this as another patch soon.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Chris
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 4:17 PM, lucene <lucene@mikemccandless.com
>> <mailto:lucene@mikemccandless.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     The usage of deprecated methods (at least Filter.bits()) should be
>>     fixed now.
>>
>>     Mike
>>
>>     On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Alex <azlist1@gmail.com
>>     <mailto:azlist1@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>     > Hi,
>>     >
>>     > I would definitely give it a hole bunch of love if only I
>>     understood how to
>>     > have it working :)
>>     >
>>     > I did a few tests based on the test cases provided in the
>>     current version
>>     > but without any success...
>>     > Moreover, as far as I recall,during my tests some method calls were
>>     > deprecated in favour of more recent Lucene 2.9 methods. So I
>>     don't know if
>>     > it needs rewriting or not.
>>     >
>>     > I would love to write the javadoc for the entire spatial contrib
>>     (I have
>>     > some time to do it) but I would really need to understand and to
>>     have a
>>     > working example to base my writings on ... as for now I am
>>     pretty lost.
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > Cheers,
>>     >
>>     > Alex
>>     >
>>
>>     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>     To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>     <mailto:java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
>>     For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>     <mailto:java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Chris Male | Software Developer | JTeam BV.| T: +31-(0)6-14344438 |
>> www.jteam.nl <http://www.jteam.nl>
>
>
> --
> - Mark
>
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message