lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ryan McKinley <ryan...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Lucene Spatial
Date Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:33:41 GMT
and a 3rd!


On Sep 24, 2009, at 11:51 AM, lucene wrote:

> Make that a 2nd thank you!
>
> Mike
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Mark Miller  
> <markrmiller@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Nice! That is *awesome*. Thank you!
>>
>> gento0nz wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Since my contribution in LUCENE-1732 I have been working on re- 
>>> writing
>>> most of the spatial contrib, particularly the Cartesian Tier  
>>> code.  I
>>> have added javadoc, tests and and have removed many of the classes
>>> which were either deprecated, unused or unnecessary.  I have also
>>> tried to define easier extension points for adding things like JTS
>>> support, and different data formats (whether it be geohashes or
>>> traditional latitude and longitude).  Much of the work has been done
>>> with Solr integration in mind with the overall goal being to create
>>> enterprise ready spatial search support.
>>>
>>> I am also planning on collaborating with some of the developers from
>>> the JPL to improve the range the geographic functions supported  
>>> and to
>>> provide efficient searching with even the most massive and varied of
>>> data sets.
>>>
>>> I have every intention to contribute this as another patch soon.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Chris
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 4:17 PM, lucene <lucene@mikemccandless.com
>>> <mailto:lucene@mikemccandless.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     The usage of deprecated methods (at least Filter.bits())  
>>> should be
>>>     fixed now.
>>>
>>>     Mike
>>>
>>>     On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Alex <azlist1@gmail.com
>>>     <mailto:azlist1@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>     > Hi,
>>>     >
>>>     > I would definitely give it a hole bunch of love if only I
>>>     understood how to
>>>     > have it working :)
>>>     >
>>>     > I did a few tests based on the test cases provided in the
>>>     current version
>>>     > but without any success...
>>>     > Moreover, as far as I recall,during my tests some method  
>>> calls were
>>>     > deprecated in favour of more recent Lucene 2.9 methods. So I
>>>     don't know if
>>>     > it needs rewriting or not.
>>>     >
>>>     > I would love to write the javadoc for the entire spatial  
>>> contrib
>>>     (I have
>>>     > some time to do it) but I would really need to understand  
>>> and to
>>>     have a
>>>     > working example to base my writings on ... as for now I am
>>>     pretty lost.
>>>     >
>>>     >
>>>     > Cheers,
>>>     >
>>>     > Alex
>>>     >
>>>
>>>      
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>     To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>     <mailto:java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
>>>     For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>     <mailto:java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Chris Male | Software Developer | JTeam BV.| T: +31-(0)6-14344438 |
>>> www.jteam.nl <http://www.jteam.nl>
>>
>>
>> --
>> - Mark
>>
>> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message