lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shon Vella <sve...@technologist.com>
Subject Re: Numeric Field index compatibility
Date Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:42:44 GMT
Thanks, Uwe. I suspected as much, but wanted to make sure.

-Shon

Uwe Schindler wrote:
> The term format did not change since the major revision with Yonik at the
> begin of year. Only the API and term generation was changed (NumericField,
> NumericTokenStream).
> 
> If you use the same precStep it should work.
> 
> -----
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Shon Vella [mailto:svella@technologist.com]
>> Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 4:27 PM
>> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Numeric Field index compatibility
>>
>> I have some indexes that were created using a dev version of 2.9 from
>> early June, when the Numeric field stuff was moved to lucene core from
>> the query contrib package. Now that 2.9 is becoming available, I need to
>> migrate to using the stuff in core and was wondering about the index
>> level compatibility between the two. In other words, can I use the stuff
>> in core against an index that was created using the contrib stuff?
>>
>> -Shon
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message