lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michael McCandless (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1906) Problem with CharStream and Tokenizers with custom reset(Reader) method
Date Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:07:58 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753679#action_12753679
] 

Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1906:
--------------------------------------------

+1, good catch Uwe!

> Problem with CharStream and Tokenizers with custom reset(Reader) method
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1906
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Analysis
>    Affects Versions: 2.9
>            Reporter: Uwe Schindler
>            Assignee: Uwe Schindler
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 2.9
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1906.patch
>
>
> When reviewing the new CharStream code added to Tokenizers, I found a
> serious problem with backwards compatibility and other Tokenizers, that do
> not override reset(CharStream).
> The problem is, that e.g. CharTokenizer only overrides reset(Reader):
> {code}
>   public void reset(Reader input) throws IOException {
>     super.reset(input);
>     bufferIndex = 0;
>     offset = 0;
>     dataLen = 0;
>   }
> {code}
> If you reset such a Tokenizer with another CharStream (not a Reader), this
> method will never be called and breaking the whole Tokenizer.
> As CharStream extends Reader, I propose to remove this reset(CharStream
> method) and simply do an instanceof check to detect if the supplied Reader
> is no CharStream and wrap it. We could also remove the extra ctor (because
> most Tokenizers have no support for passing CharStreams). If the ctor also
> checks with instanceof and warps as needed the code is backwards compatible
> and we do not need to add additional ctors in subclasses.
> As this instanceof check is always done in CharReader.get() why not remove
> ctor(CharStream) and reset(CharStream) completely?
> Any thoughts?
> I would like to fix this somehow before RC4, I'm, sorry :(

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message