lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mark Miller (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1900) Confusing Javadoc in Searchable.java
Date Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:25:57 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12752618#action_12752618
] 

Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1900:
-------------------------------------

bq. My vote would be to just strip that extra comment about calculating term weights.

+1 - unless someone else comments, I'm just going to do that.


> Confusing Javadoc in Searchable.java
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1900
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1900
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Search
>    Affects Versions: 2.9
>            Reporter: Nadav Har'El
>            Priority: Trivial
>
> In Searchable.java, the javadoc for maxdoc() is:
>   /** Expert: Returns one greater than the largest possible document number.
>    * Called by search code to compute term weights.
>    * @see org.apache.lucene.index.IndexReader#maxDoc()
> The qualification "expert" and the statement "called by search code to compute term weights"
is a bit confusing, It implies that maxdoc() somehow computes weights, which is obviously
not true (what it does is explained in the other sentence). Maybe it is used as one factor
of the weight, but do we really need to mention this here? 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message