Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 30364 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2009 21:19:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Aug 2009 21:19:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 9544 invoked by uid 500); 5 Aug 2009 21:19:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 9475 invoked by uid 500); 5 Aug 2009 21:19:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 9440 invoked by uid 99); 5 Aug 2009 21:19:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Aug 2009 21:19:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yseeley@gmail.com designates 74.125.78.27 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.78.27] (HELO ey-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.78.27) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Aug 2009 21:19:17 +0000 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so233768eyd.53 for ; Wed, 05 Aug 2009 14:18:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:reply-to:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YmvSChvkAQctRweHQ5aJVA8V2P7AHUlT1ZKHV5po0u0=; b=wp5QWdvUQwh8HRRI1LAPg24Bk3YpsfZvRII/GyQuCOaYyfX83R2oFmOIrBr4PPKT0k Vdb7NMl289Yck4RvGjfaftIL9S081O7s7bA1p21+mdY0BaSlqU64kcs+Kqq4G5iOAbBl OposaBOutFKpwdCFfZlBfgwsGI03Oa8pDdoGE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=dk8gxGywqnUHMj8N4pNsdry+urMjoUqB1MbPuVQ49YnIDi5ZQIoHMvTyz/FSRB2XXr 5B0Tgljp6vIGX6u5Rk8qKFm8LfxlPNFZc+zrP+ZKEGyjcG0swpMiTzOJ/dQIgIst8IJb mURcZbAlMTs9zup8BcYOfRIOgeFjmILa1iihI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: yseeley@gmail.com Reply-To: yonik@lucidimagination.com Received: by 10.216.18.82 with SMTP id k60mr1872001wek.118.1249507137173; Wed, 05 Aug 2009 14:18:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A79F484.9080404@gmail.com> References: <4A79E4D6.9040008@gmail.com> <9ac0c6aa0908051304v45844659j96f4c3638346a081@mail.gmail.com> <4A79E93A.3040804@gmail.com> <9ac0c6aa0908051335q427e3fbbmffb3e88e66ecbf13@mail.gmail.com> <4A79F484.9080404@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:18:57 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: e844cddbf4176904 Message-ID: Subject: Re: benchmark: lucene24 vs lucene29 From: Yonik Seeley To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > It is autocommit. Changing it to false for 2.4 brings it down to one minute > slower than 2.9. > > When its on, wa is 20-30% and the cpu just barley moves. When its off, its a > similar profile to 2.9. > > Theres a speed trap :) > > I'm on ext4. That's unfortunate - I had thought ext4 was supposed to be better at this. I have noticed that my ubuntu 9.04 ext4 box does a Solr "ant clean test" slower than my vista laptop, even though it's a faster box ("ant example" completes in 8 sec in ubuntu, 24 sec on vista). -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org