Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 66516 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2009 12:46:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Aug 2009 12:46:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 76819 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2009 12:46:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 76708 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2009 12:46:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 76700 invoked by uid 99); 1 Aug 2009 12:46:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Aug 2009 12:46:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yseeley@gmail.com designates 74.125.78.26 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.78.26] (HELO ey-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.78.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Aug 2009 12:46:01 +0000 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so699716eyd.53 for ; Sat, 01 Aug 2009 05:45:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:reply-to:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=57MgSqPeU9UwObNyN9BQ0HXke7Mh3xBaDeUbaJTCRy0=; b=joX6+1RLJNMjf1CUdUiAFuTsrdeJoWYL4L8IP9VZYdYsokdLOzaXt+oqE+EQ1vEf00 wch+fUKMgLrcnxiW0PbLhveHPmUokutvLWkJvhtvzmhxmVJY1k88Msw+qF7Y89cfv4mb Ta8Ll3emPpGd7l7oF7Cmovc2/qCy1RKv46a0g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=PtmLmESsV7F1F6RDZjmrbBzlueLu+0z7KVpP6h4Id/64xlUh202kr5q9SIeNfsT1g1 3vj+7vFgqFl7xKX9xicGmMhmBZoYKuMEdkF9if+mQGrnMcylpc7DLgud9qUCfMm7nJs/ 0BxjrIq167o8YjZcoyqy/QNtoYTta6lYd4vfw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: yseeley@gmail.com Reply-To: yonik@lucidimagination.com Received: by 10.216.30.5 with SMTP id j5mr696936wea.209.1249130741238; Sat, 01 Aug 2009 05:45:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7CFF6868-718E-4C43-B960-7EB5C0F814E0@gmail.com> References: <5F08F93A-A275-4ED7-9CE6-8184DD8FCD18@apache.org> <7CFF6868-718E-4C43-B960-7EB5C0F814E0@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 08:45:41 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4317406d31a9d4a8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: IndexWriter.getReader usage From: Yonik Seeley To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 8:30 AM, DM Smith wrote: > On Aug 1, 2009, at 7:52 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: >>=A0I'm wondering how the new IndexWriter.getReader stuff relates to >> that approach? =A0Is there even a need for the RAM dirs at this point? > > I'm curious as to how it obviates the need for a RAM dir? I think Grant just meant that when implementing very low latency searching, one may not need to directly use RAMDirectory anymore. RAMDirectory itself will certainly be kept around in Lucene. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org