Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A8438F8.1080406@gmail.com>
References: <786fde50908130615j3a2e86d4lc4fb5fc4c7b0ad5f@mail.gmail.com>
	 <F0F2BD2C-E6E3-41D0-BB40-BFB182A6516D@apache.org>
	 <786fde50908130824q335c9b02qd38e3b92244f6cfd@mail.gmail.com>
	 <9ac0c6aa0908130856g1585ca1aq8e25ff85f0da4bb5@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4A8438F8.1080406@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 12:03:34 -0400
Message-ID: <9ac0c6aa0908130903tff4496nc480138edb969830@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Java 5 creeped again to Benchmark?
From: Michael McCandless <lucene@mikemccandless.com>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I could go for that as well :)

Mike

On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Mark Miller<markrmiller@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd almost just say Benchmark is 1.5 now. We try to keep contrib things t=
hat
> are 1.4 at 1.4, but why bend over backwards here to pull that task out?
> Technically there is no back compat promise here.
>
> The number of people relying on 1.4 for Benchmark has got to be ...
>
>
> Michael McCandless wrote:
>>
>> Sigh. =A0I guess we have to pull that task for 2.9.
>>
>> I'll reopen the original issue (LUCENE-1773), note this, and mark it
>> as fix for 3.0.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Shai Erera<serera@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Me too ... and you were suggesting to hold off w/ 3.0 and having 2.5 an=
d
>>> then 2.9 ... :).
>>>
>>> What do you think I should do w/ that task in the meantime?
>>>
>>> Shai
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I _so_ can't wait to have this one off of our back for a while. =A0Of
>>>> course, then we'll have 1.6 creep... =A0;-)
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 13, 2009, at 9:15 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I up SVN and noticed some compilation errors in my eclipse in
>>>>> SearchTravRetVectorHighlightTask. I added FastVectorHighlighter to my
>>>>> build
>>>>> path, but it failed again because the latter is Java 1.5 compliant, a=
nd
>>>>> I
>>>>> set the compiler level to 1.4 (to comply w/ core and benchmark level)=
.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe this task should be put aside until we upgrade benchmark to 1.5=
?
>>>>>
>>>>> Shai
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> - Mark
>
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org