Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Message-ID: <738404965.1250790254877.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:44:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Tim Smith (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1826) All Tokenizer implementations should
 have constructor that takes an AttributeSource
In-Reply-To: <537690999.1250789895167.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Tim Smith updated LUCENE-1826:
------------------------------

    Fix Version/s: 2.9

> All Tokenizer implementations should have constructor that takes an AttributeSource
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1826
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1826
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Analysis
>    Affects Versions: 2.9
>            Reporter: Tim Smith
>             Fix For: 2.9
>
>
> I have a TokenStream implementation that joins together multiple sub TokenStreams (i then do additional filtering on top of this, so i can't just have the indexer do the merging)
> in 2.4, this worked fine.
> once one sub stream was exhausted, i just started using the next stream 
> however, in 2.9, this is very difficult, and requires copying Term buffers for every token being aggregated
> however, if all the sub TokenStreams share the same AttributeSource, and my "concat" TokenStream shares the same AttributeSource, this goes back to being very simple (and very efficient)
> So for example, i would like to see the following constructor added to StandardTokenizer:
> {code}
>   public StandardTokenizer(AttributeSource source, Reader input, boolean replaceInvalidAcronym) {
>     super(source);
>     ...
>   }
> {code}
> would likewise want similar constructors added to all Tokenizer sub classes provided by lucene

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org