Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 13051 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2009 16:37:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Aug 2009 16:37:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 23712 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2009 14:51:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 23653 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2009 14:51:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 23645 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2009 14:51:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:51:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of markrmiller@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.174] (HELO mail-pz0-f174.google.com) (209.85.222.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:51:28 +0000 Received: by pzk4 with SMTP id 4so991125pzk.29 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 07:51:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hKWPD6sIfWQ3FOHCZlx8qKCo5AcpDMucmhFBSFJ5Jio=; b=CMwhgHZGOlrGjWlkLpJHUbHkeYbFXa3xMp5xhFnyBVSiabbvtb0hSW7emNePtdAwmk uXXSr9+3ZcteNYC7MsyOX0ZwXFtMHzcx5131twSFYXRd++E+Ce1ug/NVmnPsEgHA30g+ ejAY9RHZjynDQRDDJvqe8fZk3/5YD5SEQzDqs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=hadPPEKrQcky/YUu5Ea8aC5MaFv3iqfGXNljgstgEcW0Fdjjt91bRE5ly1nVS0We0l sSlkMPkXnINTbu3+Y6KOyXhNBbagBQiFJ/EIO1j5slJP+O2Nlcx2tZryQZZrwDGZFUNo xLGZfAtYKnGgBNq6n5zaRVgBvOSgyAzt7uw3Q= Received: by 10.115.24.8 with SMTP id b8mr7227375waj.19.1251125467141; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 07:51:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.104? (ool-44c639d9.dyn.optonline.net [68.198.57.217]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm1782212pxi.6.2009.08.24.07.51.05 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 24 Aug 2009 07:51:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A92A8E1.4000209@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:51:13 -0400 From: Mark Miller User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Making TopDocCollector a bit more consumable References: <4A92A09C.5030308@gmail.com> <4A92A64C.7030508@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4A92A64C.7030508@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org We do still mark the collector methods as lower level API - so I guess my expert/non expert argument is pretty worthless :) I just don't like that the collectors require so much more internal knowledge to use than the previous versions - and just for optimization. The param list can be very simple if we don't force the user to figure out exactly what the best param list for them is on every use. Its just not easy. - Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org