Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
From: Steven A Rowe <sarowe@syr.edu>
To: "java-dev@lucene.apache.org" <java-dev@lucene.apache.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:43:42 -0400
Subject: RE: Lucene 2.9 release size
Thread-Topic: Lucene 2.9 release size
Thread-Index: AconVF/TmQCh2+VeSnaQVQD22VeQTwAAkQag
Message-ID: 
 <2D127F11DC79714E9B6A43AC9458147F2F8EF81B@suex07-mbx-03.ad.syr.edu>
References: <4A96EB4F.80005@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A96EB4F.80005@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

Hi Mark,

On 8/29/2009 at 4:24 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> It looks like 2.9 will be a much larger release. The 2.4.1 src dist I
> have is 5.9MB zipped - the 2.9 version is 15.3 MB zipped.
[snip]
>   collation 0 -> 5.5

The source code under collation is much smaller than 5.5MB - this must most=
ly be the ICU4J jar.

This prompts the question (in my mind anyway): should source releases inclu=
de third-party binary jars?

Steve


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org