Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Message-ID: <2062951542.1250770034990.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 05:07:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Tim Smith (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1821) Weight.scorer() not passed doc
 offset for "sub reader"
In-Reply-To: <1931573201.1250629228444.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12745416#action_12745416 ] 

Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-1821:
-----------------------------------

It would also be nice if the top level Searcher were pased in to Weight.scorer() (like in Weight.explain())
that way custom Weight implementations won't need to hold onto the Searcher at Weight creation time (thats a bigger patch though)

> Weight.scorer() not passed doc offset for "sub reader"
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1821
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1821
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Search
>    Affects Versions: 2.9
>            Reporter: Tim Smith
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1821.patch
>
>
> Now that searching is done on a per segment basis, there is no way for a Scorer to know the "actual" doc id for the document's it matches (only the relative doc offset into the segment)
> If using caches in your scorer that are based on the "entire" index (all segments), there is now no way to index into them properly from inside a Scorer because the scorer is not passed the needed offset to calculate the "real" docid
> suggest having Weight.scorer() method also take a integer for the doc offset
> Abstract Weight class should have a constructor that takes this offset as well as a method to get the offset
> All Weights that have "sub" weights must pass this offset down to created "sub" weights
> Details on workaround:
> In order to work around this, you must do the following:
> * Subclass IndexSearcher
> * Add "int getIndexReaderBase(IndexReader)" method to your subclass
> * during Weight creation, the Weight must hold onto a reference to the passed in Searcher (casted to your sub class)
> * during Scorer creation, the Scorer must be passed the result of YourSearcher.getIndexReaderBase(reader)
> * Scorer can now rebase any collected docids using this offset
> Example implementation of getIndexReaderBase():
> {code}
> // NOTE: more efficient implementation can be done if you cache the result if gatherSubReaders in your constructor
> public int getIndexReaderBase(IndexReader reader) {
>   if (reader == getReader()) {
>     return 0;
>   } else {
>     List readers = new ArrayList();
>     gatherSubReaders(readers);
>     Iterator iter = readers.iterator();
>     int maxDoc = 0;
>     while (iter.hasNext()) {
>       IndexReader r = (IndexReader)iter.next();
>       if (r == reader) {
>         return maxDoc;
>       } 
>       maxDoc += r.maxDoc();
>     } 
>   }
>   return -1; // reader not in searcher
> }
> {code}
> Notes:
> * This workaround makes it so you cannot serialize your custom Weight implementation

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org