lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simon Willnauer <>
Subject Re: Build failed in Hudson: Lucene-trunk #926
Date Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:50:33 GMT
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Michael
McCandless<> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Andi Vajda<> wrote:
>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2009, Michael McCandless wrote:
>>> Looks like this build failed because is
>>> down (we download BDB JARs from there, for contrib/db).
>>> This has happened a good number of times now... it'd be great to fix
>>> the contrib/db/build.xml to just skip the tests when this download
>>> fails.  I'll open an issue but I'm not sure how to do this w/ ant.
>> I'm not sure about the licensing ramifications, but a simple fix for this
>> would be to check in that db.jar file. Being unsure about licensing is what
>> stopped me from doing it in the first place.
> Yeah, I agree: checking it in would be simplest.  Simon has an email
> pending to legal@ about this.
> Mike
I would like to check it in and the first reply on legal mentioned
that it would be ok but I wanna have some more guys confirming it
before we check it in. I just uploaded a new patch that disables
everything when jar can not be downloaded. Before we are not
absolutely sure about the legal terms we should not commit the jar
especially with having 2.9 half way out the door.


> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message