lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mark Miller (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Issue Comment Edited: (LUCENE-1771) Using explain may double ram reqs for fieldcaches when using ValueSourceQuery/CustomScoreQuery or for ConstantScoreQuerys that use a caching Filter.
Date Tue, 04 Aug 2009 20:17:14 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739130#action_12739130
] 

Mark Miller edited comment on LUCENE-1771 at 8/4/09 1:16 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------

searcher doesn't have access to numDocs (termqueryweight) at the moment ...

*edit*

N/M - the IndexSearcher will have getIndexReader

      was (Author: markrmiller@gmail.com):
    searcher doesn't have access to numDocs (termqueryweight) at the moment ...
  
> Using explain may double ram reqs for fieldcaches when using ValueSourceQuery/CustomScoreQuery
or for ConstantScoreQuerys that use a caching Filter.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1771
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Search
>            Reporter: Mark Miller
>            Assignee: Mark Miller
>             Fix For: 2.9
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1771.patch
>
>


-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message