lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michael McCandless (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1872) Improve javadocs for Numeric*
Date Sat, 29 Aug 2009 12:35:32 GMT


Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1872:

bq. Will we mark it as experimental or not?

Yes, I think we should keep the experimental warning.  I didn't mean to remove any -- I'll
make sure they're all still there.

bq. By the way, I also reviewd the LIA chapter and have also seen the reference to DateTools
(will send you my updates soon)

Excellent, thanks!

bq.  ate to a String with a special date resolution and then convertin back to numeric is
somehow ineffective. When indexing only hour resolution, I would take Date.getTime() / 3600L
/ 1000L.

True, and that'll work for DAY as well, but not for MONTH / YEAR resolution.

bq. Maybe you could copy some of your explanations also to NumericTokenStream, e.g. the example.
In the original, both classes had similar introduction texts.

OK I'll update NumericTokenStream too.

> Improve javadocs for Numeric*
> -----------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-1872
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.9
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1872.patch
> I'm working on improving Numeric* javadocs.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message