lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Uwe Schindler (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1504) SerialChainFilter should use DocSet API rather then deprecated BitSet API
Date Sun, 02 Aug 2009 09:32:14 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12738027#action_12738027
] 

Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1504:
---------------------------------------

I had no time to review the whole patch yet, but it seems to fit much better in the new DocIdSet
API. I will look into this after my holiday (Thursday+).

> SerialChainFilter should use DocSet API rather then deprecated BitSet API
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1504
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1504
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: contrib/spatial
>            Reporter: Ryan McKinley
>            Assignee: Uwe Schindler
>             Fix For: 2.9
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1504.patch, LUCENE-1504.patch, LUCENE-1504.patch, LUCENE-1504.patch
>
>
> From erik's comments in LUCENE-1387
>     * Maybe the Filter's should be using the DocIdSet API rather than the BitSet deprecated
stuff? We can refactor that after being committed I supposed, but not something we want to
leave like that.
> We should also look at moving SerialChainFilter out of the spatial contrib since it is
more generally useful then just spatial search.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message