Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 76917 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2009 23:56:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jul 2009 23:56:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 55499 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 23:56:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 55396 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 23:56:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 55388 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2009 23:56:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 23:56:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.69.42.181] (HELO radix.cryptio.net) (208.69.42.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 23:55:51 +0000 Received: by radix.cryptio.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id CD0CA71C2D9; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:55:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by radix.cryptio.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB72971C2B2 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:55:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:55:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Hostetter To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1764) SampleComparable doesn't work well in contrib/remote tests In-Reply-To: <2048780176.1248823274868.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Message-ID: References: <2048780176.1248823274868.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org : We prob want a javadoc warning of some kind too though right? Its not : immediately obvious that when you switch to using remote, you better : have implemented some form of equals/hashcode or you will have a memory : leak. Hmmm, now i'm confused. Uwe's comment in the issue said "This is noted in the docs." and i beleived him and figured the problem was exclusive to the SampleComparable in the test ... but now that i'm *looking* at the docs, i don't see any red flags (in SortField, RemoteSearchable, SoreComparator, etc...) Uwe? -Hoss --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org