lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Robert Muir (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1728) Move SmartChineseAnalyzer & resources to own contrib project
Date Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:01:47 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726155#action_12726155
] 

Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1728:
-------------------------------------

Simon, what do you think about name for the new folder?

I am concerned users will be confused between analyzers/cjk, analyzers/cn and analyzer-cn,
all of which are different.
Should we name the new package analyzer-cnhmm or something to help clarify it? 
I intend to also add a little wordage to the javadocs to help disambiguate this, whatever
we decide to name it.

thanks 

> Move SmartChineseAnalyzer & resources to own contrib project
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1728
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1728
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: contrib/analyzers
>            Reporter: Simon Willnauer
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.9
>
>
> SmartChineseAnalyzer depends on  a large dictionary that causes the analyzer jar to grow
up to 3MB. The dictionary is quite big compared to all the other resouces / class files contained
in that jar. 
> Having a separate analyzer-cn contrib project enables footprint-sensitive users (e.g.
using lucene on a mobile phone) to include analyzer.jar without getting into trouble with
disk space.
> Moving SmartChineseAnalyzer to a separate project could also include a small refactoring
as Robert mentioned in [LUCENE-1722|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1722] several
classes should be package protected, members and classes could be final, commented syserr
and logging code should be removed etc.
> I set this issue target to 2.9 - if we can not make it until then feel free to move it
to 3.0

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message