lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Simon Willnauer (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1722) SmartChineseAnalyzer javadoc improvement
Date Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:02:47 GMT


Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-1722:

bq. In my opinion, things such as Utility class and everything in .hhmm package should be
package-protected. I already wasted time partially javadocing these things, which probably
wasn't a complete waste, but you get the idea.
Yeah those could be cleaned up quite a bit. Lets do this in a different patch / issue after
this one is commited.

bq. I think in the short term, I like this patch as is because I think developers will be
able to port it to the new API and users will be able to understand what it does.
Lets get it in, it is a huge improvement to the Chinese documentation and needed too.

bq. I can come back around later and do a more thorough job, but this isn't the only analyzer
that needs some documentation improvements!
Thanks for the attitude!


> SmartChineseAnalyzer javadoc improvement
> ----------------------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-1722
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: contrib/analyzers
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>            Assignee: Simon Willnauer
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1722.txt
> Chinese -> English, and corrections to match reality (removes several javadoc warnings)

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message