lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Grant Ingersoll <>
Subject Re: software grants
Date Sat, 11 Jul 2009 21:49:15 GMT
FWIW, I'm not trying to make it harder to donate, but I do want to  
make sure anything we accept is legally correct.  Thus, I'd rather err  
on the side of caution.   I suspect most people would rather have code  
that has less features and is legally correct versus more features and  
the code be legally in doubt.  I'm happy to defer to legal-discuss@,  
board@, incubator@ when it is in question.


On Jul 11, 2009, at 2:48 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:

> On Jul 11, 2009, at 9:18 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
>>> I personally don't get what all the fuss is about.
>> I'm simply trying to avoid having rules I view as too strict (if
>> interpreted strictly) enshrined as policy.
>>> It's not hard to do a grant
>> From the contributor side, it can be very, very, hard and can
>> potentially take a long time. The bigger the company, the harder it
>> can be.
>> Many may not pursue a contribution at all it if they thought one  
>> would
>> be required.
>> We shouldn't make contributions harder unless it's very necessary.
> When there is doubt as to the legality of the donation, then it  
> isn't a question of harder or easier.  It's just a matter of doing  
> it right.
>>> when it lives somewhere else in public or was developed by a  
>>> company or several  individuals, it needs a grant.
>> That's way too strict.
> I don't see how something can be stated as too strict when it states  
> it on the Incubator page which was chartered by the board to put it  
> in place.  I'd encourage you to take your questions to legal or  
> incubator when it arises.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message