Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 91133 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2009 00:32:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jun 2009 00:32:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 21022 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2009 00:33:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 20953 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2009 00:33:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 20944 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2009 00:33:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:33:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yseeley@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.227 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.227] (HELO mail-ew0-f227.google.com) (209.85.219.227) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:33:00 +0000 Received: by ewy27 with SMTP id 27so449000ewy.5 for ; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:32:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:reply-to:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eAl2KAAsLtbqpBwo/nOWB1sBpO6TwcqD1uHznAaDBfw=; b=nKrxO0vpxrrkzN9rCOdD6ebypwUfsrmXrsDOSp0yb5okT1AUJyoFlW7h7fxzq6Le3+ 62t9syWArbzpxPkHr41shYxYwdd4c3myCCL+S50p604epYG9O8KzznSTjTy7irjUvgCc JYwK0HTxWFx13c2zAfCA/t8WRO7If5gdsWztI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=GERxEm5CnozmeGPnVKo3pSELosGdFOlaaRneSpo2kYXnVeIqBFyG4Y1KCz0Y3x6HsD y3604W+u1N4JYhbGRuWGXq5RSwBfkPl8Fu4ZRLhqVBeZriu1wwzX29KYMYZ42V27KUo9 infxNfQznXOmeqrDZ8wjDPJVNGkzPlbyD1Dmo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: yseeley@gmail.com Reply-To: yonik@lucidimagination.com Received: by 10.216.2.78 with SMTP id 56mr271847wee.2.1244593959054; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:32:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <59b3eb370906091723p3b1ee977x4f713d48508e4c0@mail.gmail.com> References: <1459370388.1244589547335.JavaMail.jira@brutus> <4A2EF3EC.9070405@gmail.com> <59b3eb370906091723p3b1ee977x4f713d48508e4c0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 20:32:38 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 837c7351340e2164 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Commented: (LUCENE-1678) Deprecate Analyzer.tokenStream From: Yonik Seeley To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Earwin Burrfoot wrote: >> IMO, changes to interfaces should be clearly better than what existed before. > Recent changes to DISI? Were they clearly for the better? Recent *proposed* changes.... yes, for 3.0. If you include the scorer changes, it's a bigger change than it appears, and one I'm not sure I'd be comfortable with in a point release. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org