Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 8897 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2009 16:45:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jun 2009 16:45:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 12892 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2009 16:46:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 12805 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2009 16:46:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 12797 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2009 16:46:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:46:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.217.215] (HELO mail-gx0-f215.google.com) (209.85.217.215) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:45:53 +0000 Received: by gxk11 with SMTP id 11so3542410gxk.5 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:45:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.74.9 with SMTP id b9mr7856564ybl.161.1244825131791; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:45:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8f0ad1f30906120609k41d5404aid731ad6aa32efc9f@mail.gmail.com> References: <9ac0c6aa0906120333i5eb6824ek6bff438245346653@mail.gmail.com> <8f0ad1f30906120609k41d5404aid731ad6aa32efc9f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:45:31 -0400 Message-ID: <9ac0c6aa0906120945i1cb56f66hf1e93246f7aa85c7@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: 3.0, back-compat, Java 1.5 etc From: Michael McCandless To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Robert Muir wrote: >> >> 3.0 will then be a mechanical release: "simply" remove all deprecated >> APIs, fix all core, contrib, tests to not use those APIs, release, and >> immediately begin accepting 1.5 patches. >> > > personally, I wonder if anyone but me is interested in correcting the > issue that unicode character no longer fits in java 'char' in java 1.5 > :) > > maybe I am the only one, but i still think its correctness issue..., > and will require changing some apis, even if its just char->int I think this is important. But it's a big change right? EG would we need to change tokens to be int not char based? Also, can't this happen after 3.0? Mike --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org