Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 79249 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2009 20:13:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jun 2009 20:13:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 75662 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2009 20:13:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 75568 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2009 20:13:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 75560 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2009 20:13:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:13:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:13:27 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674AD234C004 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:13:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <91450532.1245701587415.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:13:07 -0700 (PDT) From: "Michael McCandless (JIRA)" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1708) Improve the use of isDeleted in the indexing code In-Reply-To: <1093380295.1245570247363.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12722789#action_12722789 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1708: -------------------------------------------- bq. Not all cleanups are bad, Oh, they are all good cleanups! I just wish they were in a dedicated "cleanup" issue, somehow, instead... because then it's harder for me to focus on the "real" changes (though I realize "clean as you go" is mighty convenient). > Improve the use of isDeleted in the indexing code > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-1708 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1708 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Index > Reporter: Shai Erera > Assignee: Michael McCandless > Fix For: 2.9 > > Attachments: LUCENE-1708.patch, LUCENE-1708.patch > > > A spin off from here: http://www.nabble.com/Some-thoughts-around-the-use-of-reader.isDeleted-and-hasDeletions-td23931216.html. > Two changes: > # Optimize SegmentMerger work when a reader has no deletions. > # IndexReader.document() will no longer check if the document is deleted. > Will post a patch shortly -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org