Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 82133 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2009 21:00:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jun 2009 21:00:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 20182 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2009 21:00:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 20096 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2009 21:00:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 20088 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2009 21:00:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:00:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:00:29 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4096234C055 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:00:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <877801846.1245099608736.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:00:08 -0700 (PDT) From: "Uwe Schindler (JIRA)" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1541) Trie range - make trie range indexing more flexible In-Reply-To: <717634197.1234898219722.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719769#action_12719769 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1541: --------------------------------------- I see no real use in it, it does not affect query performance, only index size. Maybe we should move it to 3.1 until I have some time, but the Payload thing is more interesting and maybe this can be combined. > Trie range - make trie range indexing more flexible > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-1541 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1541 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: contrib/* > Affects Versions: 2.9 > Reporter: Ning Li > Assignee: Uwe Schindler > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 2.9 > > Attachments: LUCENE-1541.patch, LUCENE-1541.patch > > > In the current trie range implementation, a single precision step is specified. With a large precision step (say 8), a value is indexed in fewer terms (8) but the number of terms for a range can be large. With a small precision step (say 2), the number of terms for a range is smaller but a value is indexed in more terms (32). > We want to add an option that different precision steps can be set for different precisions. An expert can use this option to keep the number of terms for a range small and at the same time index a value in a small number of terms. See the discussion in LUCENE-1470 that results in this issue. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org