Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 52902 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2009 21:26:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jun 2009 21:26:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 66711 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2009 21:26:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 66643 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2009 21:26:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 66635 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2009 21:26:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:26:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jason.rutherglen@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.189 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.189] (HELO mail-px0-f189.google.com) (209.85.216.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:26:24 +0000 Received: by pxi27 with SMTP id 27so290146pxi.29 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:26:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=B89CyFg7hqRe/vA4NZjR+xpabPWAzTQkFG1Bb35K2sE=; b=xiWkeUIeZ0Zb9RmcVD3psV0uL70O/fxgJjSxAU3LYV1ZkaWuNMKx88kLyQGsCLlPxD 2QxuyOBmbcIO6QJCGWJpxfKw5TwTkI77T6X/z2cZZBYr4I+ipgQ6q0mU1jBnjuHfkZG7 p/hQkvshpszqg0oX9rIwXY8jpa7oOzzq0svco= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=OIuGNpWLpac/xEOx5v/s4DxgI/QZZXZ9U6v7bWGJAszM6R2tnO2fZ1Y0+y/o6lKRp0 4M/fbvfSV02D9HikFJ5G0mTMEbjvecf5idtcvuKzdP5cxn4oDfHjt1LVOTANSt+rxR9o mCOuVcXOL0K8FLZsDv8lmnaxO7N12YEtVmwU8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.141.16 with SMTP id o16mr569149rvd.241.1245792364182; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:26:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:26:04 -0700 Message-ID: <85d3c3b60906231426h6eed45ecg1921152f29c90286@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Improving TimeLimitedCollector From: Jason Rutherglen To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd16e8054bdf1046d0aa315 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd16e8054bdf1046d0aa315 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit As we're revamping collectors, weights, and scorers, perhaps we can push time limiting into the individual subscorers? Currently on a boolean query, we're timing out the query at the top level which doesn't work well if the subqueries exceed the time limit. --000e0cd16e8054bdf1046d0aa315 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable As we're revamping collectors, weights, and scorers, perhaps we
can = push time limiting into the individual subscorers? Currently
on a boolea= n query, we're timing out the query at the top level
which doesn'= ;t work well if the subqueries exceed the time limit.
--000e0cd16e8054bdf1046d0aa315--