Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 42903 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2009 07:23:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jun 2009 07:23:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 76625 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2009 07:23:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 76545 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2009 07:23:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 76532 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2009 07:23:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:23:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:23:28 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0647234C004 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:23:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2108021341.1244704987774.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:23:07 -0700 (PDT) From: "Shai Erera (JIRA)" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1482) Replace infoSteram by a logging framework (SLF4J) In-Reply-To: <1731807158.1228745684237.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718327#action_12718327 ] Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1482: ------------------------------------ I'm not even sure if this issue should be kept around, given the responses I got to it. The question is - do we think logging should be improved in Lucene or not? If YES, then let's keep the issue around and come back in 3.0. If NO, then let's cancel it. It hasn't been commented on for ~6 months, so there's no point to keep it around unless we think it should be resolved at some point > Replace infoSteram by a logging framework (SLF4J) > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-1482 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1482 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Index > Reporter: Shai Erera > Fix For: 3.0 > > Attachments: LUCENE-1482-2.patch, LUCENE-1482.patch, slf4j-api-1.5.6.jar, slf4j-nop-1.5.6.jar > > > Lucene makes use of infoStream to output messages in its indexing code only. For debugging purposes, when the search application is run on the customer side, getting messages from other code flows, like search, query parsing, analysis etc can be extremely useful. > There are two main problems with infoStream today: > 1. It is owned by IndexWriter, so if I want to add logging capabilities to other classes I need to either expose an API or propagate infoStream to all classes (see for example DocumentsWriter, which receives its infoStream instance from IndexWriter). > 2. I can either turn debugging on or off, for the entire code. > Introducing a logging framework can allow each class to control its logging independently, and more importantly, allows the application to turn on logging for only specific areas in the code (i.e., org.apache.lucene.index.*). > I've investigated SLF4J (stands for Simple Logging Facade for Java) which is, as it names states, a facade over different logging frameworks. As such, you can include the slf4j.jar in your application, and it recognizes at deploy time what is the actual logging framework you'd like to use. SLF4J comes with several adapters for Java logging, Log4j and others. If you know your application uses Java logging, simply drop slf4j.jar and slf4j-jdk14.jar in your classpath, and your logging statements will use Java logging underneath the covers. > This makes the logging code very simple. For a class A the logger will be instantiated like this: > public class A { > private static final logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(A.class); > } > And will later be used like this: > public class A { > private static final logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(A.class); > public void foo() { > if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) { > logger.debug("message"); > } > } > } > That's all ! > Checking for isDebugEnabled is very quick, at least using the JDK14 adapter (but I assume it's fast also over other logging frameworks). > The important thing is, every class controls its own logger. Not all classes have to output logging messages, and we can improve Lucene's logging gradually, w/o changing the API, by adding more logging messages to interesting classes. > I will submit a patch shortly -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org