Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 36548 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2009 16:58:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jun 2009 16:58:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 28721 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2009 16:58:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 28646 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2009 16:58:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 28638 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2009 16:58:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:58:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:58:27 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 530A5234C045 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:58:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1794342653.1245776287339.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:58:07 -0700 (PDT) From: "Simon Willnauer (JIRA)" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1715) DirectoryIndexReader finalize() holding TermInfosReader longer than necessary In-Reply-To: <956133262.1245769807949.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1715?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12723184#action_12723184 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-1715: ----------------------------------------- bq. Does that really help GC? (I thought not) It really depends on the VM implementation. In a dalvik VM people start nulling stuff all the time because it helps GC. In that case where a lot of memory can be collected I guess its worth to null the references. I generally do not null references but in this case I would really to it. so +1 from my side. > DirectoryIndexReader finalize() holding TermInfosReader longer than necessary > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-1715 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1715 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Index > Affects Versions: 2.4.1 > Environment: Sun JDK 6 update 12 64-bit, Debian Lenny > Reporter: Brian Groose > Assignee: Michael McCandless > Fix For: 2.9 > > > DirectoryIndexReader has a finalize method, which causes the JDK to keep a reference to the object until it can be finalized. SegmentReader and MultiSegmentReader are subclasses that contain references to, potentially, hundreds of megabytes of cached data in a TermInfosReader. > Some options would be removing finalize() from DirectoryIndexReader (it releases a write lock at the moment) or possibly nulling out references in various close() and doClose() methods throughout the class hierarchy so that the finalizable object doesn't references the Term arrays. > Original mailing list message: > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-java-user/200906.mbox/%3C7A5CB4A7BBCE0C40B81C5145C326C31301A62971@NUMEVP06.na.imtn.com%3E -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org