lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Yonik Seeley <yo...@lucidimagination.com>
Subject Re: Payloads and TrieRangeQuery
Date Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:10:02 GMT
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Michael McCandless
<lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Yonik Seeley<yonik@lucidimagination.com> wrote:
>
>>> And this information about the trie
>>> structure and where payloads are should be stored in FieldInfos.
>>
>> As is the case today, the info is encoded in the class you use (and
>> it's settings)... no need to add it to the index structure.  In any
>> case, it's a completely different issue and shouldn't be tied to
>> TrieRange improvements.
>
> The problem is, because the details of Trie* at index time affect
> what's in each segment, this information needs to be stored per
> segment.

That's the case with the analysis for every field.  If you change your
analyzer in a non-compatible fashion, you need to re-index.

-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message