lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael McCandless <>
Subject Re: back compat is good
Date Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:22:46 GMT
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Yonik Seeley<> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Mark Miller <> wrote:
>> The computer should handle that
>> for me. It really should be as easy
>> as saying, look I want the best new defaults, or I want the back compat
>> defaults. The computer should figure
>> out the rest for me.
> actsAsVersion ;-)
> nice and back compatible.
> Introduce Settings classes in the future when+where it makes sense.


But, per class (not global), and on an as-needed basis.

I still think this is a good, simple solution to implementing our
back-compat... so I opened LUCENE-1684 to add a "matchVersion" arg to
StandardAnalyzer, and I think it actually works very well.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message