lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Uwe Schindler (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Created: (LUCENE-1673) Move TrieRange to core
Date Mon, 01 Jun 2009 14:33:07 GMT
Move TrieRange to core
----------------------

                 Key: LUCENE-1673
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1673
             Project: Lucene - Java
          Issue Type: New Feature
          Components: Search
    Affects Versions: 2.9
            Reporter: Uwe Schindler
            Assignee: Uwe Schindler
             Fix For: 2.9


TrieRange was iterated many times and seems stable now (LUCENE-1470, LUCENE-1582, LUCENE-1602).
There is lots of user interest, Solr added it to its default FieldTypes (SOLR-940) and if
possible I want to move it to core before release of 2.9.
Before this can be done, there are some things to think about:
# There are now classes called LongTrieRangeQuery, IntTrieRangeQuery, how should they be called
in core? I would suggest to leave it as it is. On the other hand, if this keeps our only numeric
query implementation, we could call it LongRangeQuery, IntRangeQuery or NumericRangeQuery
(see below, here are problems). Same for the TokenStreams and Filters.
# Maybe the pairs of classes for indexing and searching should be moved into one class: NumericTokenStream,
NumericRangeQuery, NumericRangeFilter. The problem here: ctors must be able to pass int, long,
double, float as range parameters. For the end user, mixing these 4 types in one class is
hard to handle. If somebody forgets to add a L to a long, it suddenly instantiates a int version
of range query, hitting no results and so on. Same with other types. Maybe accept java.lang.Number
as parameter (because nullable for half-open bounds) and one enum for the type.
# TrieUtils move into o.a.l.util? or document or?
# Move TokenStreams into o.a.l.analysis, ShiftAttribute into o.a.l.analysis.tokenattributes?
Somewhere else?
# If we rename the classes, should Solr stay with Trie (because there are different impls)?
# Maybe add a subclass of AbstractField, that automatically creates these TokenStreams and
omits norms/tf per default for easier addition to Document instances?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message