lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shai Erera <ser...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: EnwikiDocMaker
Date Wed, 03 Jun 2009 12:58:24 GMT
Then perhaps as part of 1595 I can change it to use Java's XML parser, and
test the Enwiki file. If all goes well, we may not need the XERCES jar in
benchmark? Anyway, I'll check that too

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Michael McCandless <
lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote:

> I also don't know why it's specifically using Xerces...
>
> Mike
>
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:26 AM, Shai Erera <serera@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Grant, note that I'm changing the DocMakers in LUCENE-1595 including this
> > one. So whatever the decision is following your question, I can do it as
> > part of this issue, since that code will no longer be in EnwikiDocMaker.
> >
> > Regarding to your question, I don't know why it should depend on Xerces
> > (rather than the default Java XML parser I assume?)
> >
> > Shai
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:48 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Is there a reason the EnwikiDocMaker assumes Xerces for the SAX parser?
> >>  Line 96.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Grant
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Mime
View raw message