lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Grant Ingersoll <>
Subject Re: Lucene's default settings & back compatibility
Date Fri, 22 May 2009 13:45:46 GMT
Perhaps it is wise to take a step back before we play all of these  
"what if" games...

I think the best way forward is to simply ask ourselves, when  
confronted with an actual issue, is what is the cost of back compat.  
for this issue and then address it on a case by case basis, with a  
bias towards maintaining back compat if it is not too burdensome.  Too  
burdensome is a judgment call for the contributors and committers.

As for the Settings vs. static actAs stuff, I really am on the fence.   
They both have their downsides, so I'm inclined to punt.  Frankly, I  
think if someone wants 2.4.1 functionality and we're on 2.9 or even  
3.0, but some of the new features available on 2.9, then they should  
backport the patches.  I don't think the burden should be on us to  
have the trunk support every single setting that was ever available on  
a given 2.x release given the time frames we operate on  The fact is,  
we are obsessing over the name of the release, when the more important  
factor is the time it takes to make the release.  If we released once  
a month, I'd be inclined otherwise, but for the reality we are in, I'm  
almost ready we to say we should just chuck the whole major minor  
thing and say we go the MS way:  Lucene 2009 and then have service  
pack releases for just that year's major release (I realize, of  
course, they likely have internal versions, etc. but maybe not)


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message