lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com>
Subject Re: Lucene's default settings & back compatibility
Date Fri, 22 May 2009 18:13:46 GMT
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 01:22:24PM -0400, Michael McCandless wrote:
> > Sounds like an argument for more frequent major releases.
> 
> Yeah.  Or "rebranding" what we now call minor as major releases, by
> changing our policy ;) 

Not sure how much of that is a jest, bug I don't think that's a good idea.  It
violates commonly held expectations about what constitutes a "minor release".

Of course, I'm not sure to what extent modified interfaces will surprise
people.  At least that's compile-time... but then it will make it harder for
multiple apps with Lucene depenencies to coexist.

> Will Lucy do scoring when sorting by field, by default?

Nope.  Why would we do that?  The only reason you're doing it in Lucene is
to preserve back compat, and Lucy doesn't have that constraint.

Marvin Humphrey


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message