Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 71945 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2009 12:32:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Apr 2009 12:32:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 73762 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2009 12:32:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 73684 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2009 12:32:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 73676 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2009 12:32:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:32:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:32:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05515234C003 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 05:32:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <977804618.1239712334894.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 05:32:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Michael McCandless (JIRA)" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1536) if a filter can support random access API, we should use it In-Reply-To: <1491949348.1233779399612.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1536: --------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 2.9 Given the sizable performance gains, I think we should try to do this for 2.9, if possible. > if a filter can support random access API, we should use it > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-1536 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1536 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Search > Affects Versions: 2.4 > Reporter: Michael McCandless > Assignee: Michael McCandless > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 2.9 > > Attachments: LUCENE-1536.patch > > > I ran some performance tests, comparing applying a filter via > random-access API instead of current trunk's iterator API. > This was inspired by LUCENE-1476, where we realized deletions should > really be implemented just like a filter, but then in testing found > that switching deletions to iterator was a very sizable performance > hit. > Some notes on the test: > * Index is first 2M docs of Wikipedia. Test machine is Mac OS X > 10.5.6, quad core Intel CPU, 6 GB RAM, java 1.6.0_07-b06-153. > * I test across multiple queries. 1-X means an OR query, eg 1-4 > means 1 OR 2 OR 3 OR 4, whereas +1-4 is an AND query, ie 1 AND 2 > AND 3 AND 4. "u s" means "united states" (phrase search). > * I test with multiple filter densities (0, 1, 2, 5, 10, 25, 75, 90, > 95, 98, 99, 99.99999 (filter is non-null but all bits are set), > 100 (filter=null, control)). > * Method high means I use random-access filter API in > IndexSearcher's main loop. Method low means I use random-access > filter API down in SegmentTermDocs (just like deleted docs > today). > * Baseline (QPS) is current trunk, where filter is applied as iterator up > "high" (ie in IndexSearcher's search loop). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org