Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 64498 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2009 10:43:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Apr 2009 10:43:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 17765 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2009 10:43:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 17693 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2009 10:43:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 17685 invoked by uid 99); 30 Apr 2009 10:43:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:43:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of p.mukherjee@corp.aol.com designates 64.12.143.151 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.12.143.151] (HELO omr-m31.mx.aol.com) (64.12.143.151) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:42:56 +0000 Received: from AOLMTCMEH01.ad.office.aol.com (aolmtcmeh01.office.aol.com [10.178.121.20]) by omr-m31.mx.aol.com (v117.7) with ESMTP id MAILOMRM314-7f0549f9809ad5; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 06:42:34 -0400 Received: from EVSBNG01.ad.office.aol.com ([10.146.190.242]) by AOLMTCMEH01.ad.office.aol.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 30 Apr 2009 06:42:34 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C9C980.5CC2FF0F" Subject: R-trees in Lucene for spatio-textual search Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:12:30 +0530 Message-ID: <8810056BA2B04A4CB5384D122567BB9D0CE90D03@EVSBNG01.ad.office.aol.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: R-trees in Lucene for spatio-textual search Thread-Index: AcnJgF0I8h6hnO2gQr2tgQYXAEMz/w== From: "Mukherjee, Prasenjit" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Apr 2009 10:42:34.0603 (UTC) FILETIME=[5F250BB0:01C9C980] X-AOL-IP: 10.178.121.20 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01C9C980.5CC2FF0F Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi,=20 Has anybody recently used lucene to implement R-trees for range-queries. I came across the GeoLucene project but not sure how stable/efficient it is to use it for production. Any pointers in this direction will be great.=20 =20 Thanks -P ------_=_NextPart_001_01C9C980.5CC2FF0F Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,=20

Has=20 anybody recently used lucene to implement R-trees for range-queries. I = came=20 across the GeoLucene project but not sure how stable/efficient it is to = use it=20 for production. Any pointers in this direction will be great.=20

Thanks

-P

------_=_NextPart_001_01C9C980.5CC2FF0F--