Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Message-ID: <584909086.1240907731392.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:35:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Michael McCandless (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1619) TermAttribute.termLength()
 optimization
In-Reply-To: <2086881420.1240863810470.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12703537#action_12703537 ] 

Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1619:
--------------------------------------------

Indeed it seems unnecessary -- I'll commit.  Thanks Eks!

> TermAttribute.termLength() optimization
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1619
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1619
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Analysis
>            Reporter: Eks Dev
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>            Priority: Trivial
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1619.patch
>
>
>    public int termLength() {
>      initTermBuffer(); // This patch removes this method call 
>      return termLength;
>    }
> I see no reason to initTermBuffer() in termLength()... all tests pass, but I could be wrong?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org