Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 88521 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2009 10:38:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Apr 2009 10:38:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 31532 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2009 10:38:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 31450 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2009 10:38:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 31335 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2009 10:38:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 10:38:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 10:38:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3106234C003 for ; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 03:38:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <471326914.1239532694850.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 03:38:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Michael McCandless (JIRA)" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1593) Optimizations to TopScoreDocCollector and TopFieldCollector In-Reply-To: <1791214986.1239268813267.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12698204#action_12698204 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1593: -------------------------------------------- bq. Change TSDC and TFC's code to not use the doc id as a tie breaker. We have to remember that out-of-order docID collectors (BooleanScorer) cannot apply this optimization. When we get to this, lets make sure we have a test case that does out-of-order collection, with a field search, that shows failure if we fail to break ties by docID. Actually, the optimization can be applied sometimes: if we can push bottomVal testing down to each TermDocs enum (much like unfactoring random-access filter down to the TermDocs), that first pass collection in BooleanScorer is in fact in order. But that's a deeper optimization... > Optimizations to TopScoreDocCollector and TopFieldCollector > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-1593 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1593 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Search > Reporter: Shai Erera > Fix For: 2.9 > > > This is a spin-off of LUCENE-1575 and proposes to optimize TSDC and TFC code to remove unnecessary checks. The plan is: > # Ensure that IndexSearcher returns segements in increasing doc Id order, instead of numDocs(). > # Change TSDC and TFC's code to not use the doc id as a tie breaker. New docs will always have larger ids and therefore cannot compete. > # Pre-populate HitQueue with sentinel values in TSDC (score = Float.NEG_INF) and remove the check if reusableSD == null. > # Also move to use "changing top" and then call adjustTop(), in case we update the queue. > # some methods in Sort explicitly add SortField.FIELD_DOC as a "tie breaker" for the last SortField. But, doing so should not be necessary (since we already break ties by docID), and is in fact less efficient (once the above optimization is in). > # Investigate PQ - can we deprecate insert() and have only insertWithOverflow()? Add a addDummyObjects method which will populate the queue without "arranging" it, just store the objects in the array (this can be used to pre-populate sentinel values)? > I will post a patch as well as some perf measurements as soon as I have them. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org