Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Message-ID: <38963414.1240262687648.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:24:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Jason Rutherglen (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1345) Allow Filter as clause to
 BooleanQuery
In-Reply-To: <1854340418.1216849231610.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12700944#action_12700944 ] 

Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1345:
------------------------------------------

Even though Paul's patch doesn't pass a test, it sounds like it
can be benchmarked? Part of the goal of patch is to make certain
queries faster? This could help with how we approach optimizing
LUCENE-1345.

> Allow Filter as clause to BooleanQuery
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1345
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1345
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Search
>            Reporter: Paul Elschot
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.9
>
>         Attachments: booleansetperf.txt, DisjunctionDISI.java, DisjunctionDISI.patch, DisjunctionDISI.patch, LUCENE-1345-Filter+Query-merge.patch, LUCENE-1345.patch, LUCENE-1345.patch, LUCENE-1345.patch, OpenBitSetIteratorExperiment.java, TestIteratorPerf.java, TestIteratorPerf.java
>
>


-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org