Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 36705 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2009 21:47:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Apr 2009 21:47:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 95040 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2009 21:47:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 94947 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2009 21:47:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 94939 invoked by uid 99); 11 Apr 2009 21:47:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 21:47:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 21:47:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7409234C48D for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 14:47:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1369781223.1239486434946.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 14:47:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Yonik Seeley (JIRA)" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1596) optimize MultiTermEnum/MultiTermDocs In-Reply-To: <861535501.1239482595766.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12698142#action_12698142 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1596: -------------------------------------- Yes, *if* you are doing low level stuff directly on the MultiReader, like using TermEnum/TermDocs. Or calling Filter.getBits(multiReader). As you probably know, if you pass Filters or Queries to an IndexSearcher, it's now dropping down to the segment level already (a scorer is created per-segment) so it won't hit the MultiTermEnum code. > optimize MultiTermEnum/MultiTermDocs > ------------------------------------ > > Key: LUCENE-1596 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1596 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Search > Reporter: Yonik Seeley > Assignee: Yonik Seeley > Attachments: LUCENE-1596.patch > > > Optimize MultiTermEnum and MultiTermDocs to avoid seeks on TermDocs that don't match the term. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org