Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Message-ID: <1365302728.1239144613377.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Michael McCandless (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1561) Maybe rename Field.omitTf, and
 strengthen the javadocs
In-Reply-To: <1206994990.1236940790542.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1561:
---------------------------------------

    Attachment: LUCENE-1561.patch

Attached patch, also deprecating omitTf in AbstractField, and not adding the newly named methods into Fieldable.  I plan to commit in a day or two.

> Maybe rename Field.omitTf, and strengthen the javadocs
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1561
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1561
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Index
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.1
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>             Fix For: 2.9
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1561.patch, LUCENE-1561.patch
>
>
> Spinoff from here:
>   http://www.nabble.com/search-problem-when-indexed-using-Field.setOmitTf()-td22456141.html
> Maybe rename omitTf to something like omitTermPositions, and make it clear what queries will silently fail to work as a result.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org