lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Uwe Schindler" <>
Subject RE: Lucene 2.9 status (to port to Lucene.Net)
Date Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:19:34 GMT
> George, did you mean LUCENE-1516 below?  (LUCENE-1313 is a further
> improvement to near real-time search that's still being iterated on).
> In general I would say 2.9 seems to be in rather active development still
> ;)
> I too would love to hear about production/beta use of 2.9.  George
> maybe you should re-ask on java-user?

Here! I updated to Lucene-trunk today (because of incomplete
hashcode in TrieRangeQuery)... Works perfect, but I do not use the realtime
parts. And 10 days before the same, no problems :-)

Currently I rewrite parts of my code to Collector to go away from
HitCollector (without score, so optimizations)! The reopen() and sorting is
fine, almost no time is consumed for sorted searches after reopening indexes
every 20 minutes with just some new and small segments with changed
documents. No extra warming is needed.

Another change to be done here is Field.Store.COMPRESS and replace by
manually compressed binary stored fields, but this is only to get rid of the
deprecated warnings. But this cannot be done without complete reindexing.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message